In class we talked briefly about cognitive estrangement and its function and i understand the role of it in the novel entirely, but what i am not sure about is its success. Yes the novel makes me, as a reader, question the authority of the government and take that question into the realm of reality (IE: thinking about how we were all so able to compromise freedoms after 9/11 and what the consequences of that national action might be) but i do not come to these conclusions through an abstract epiphany but a direct connection. I think the novel is very blatant and if its goal was cognitive estrangement, it has faltered. I think the story would be closer related to a satire, pointing out the faults of the "other" only to eventually recognize it in ourselves. Seeing the faults in Evey's perception of the world through V's eyes lets the reader see ones own faults. This is not far removed and entirely scifi. It is just good writing.
Another satirical aspect of the plot might be the repetition of " England Prevails" which is strikingly similar to "God Bless America". This expression of perceived invincibility inevitably leads to a downfall, a quasi foreshadow into our societies future perhaps?
Overall I liked the book, the artistry was a little sketchy and unclear at times which caused slight confusion but the writing was masterful.
No comments:
Post a Comment